2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1975 Triumph Stag
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 91 kg more than 1975 Triumph Stag.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1975 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1975 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | Stag |
Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 234 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1211 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 63 L |