2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1976 Mazda 1000
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,758 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 502 kg more than 1976 Mazda 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (137 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1976 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 1000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 710 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2270 mm |