2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1977 Holden GTS
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Holden GTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Holden GTS would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Holden GTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Holden GTS (213 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Holden GTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Holden GTS weights approximately 263 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Holden GTS (400 Nm @ 3100 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (137 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1977 Holden GTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1977 Holden GTS | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | GTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 5042 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1475 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2830 mm |