2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Seat 131
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (108 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1978 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 243 kg more than 1978 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Seat 131. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1978 Seat 131 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Ranger | 131 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 965 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2500 mm |
