2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Skoda L
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Skoda L would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1978 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1978 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 450 kg more than 1978 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1978 Skoda L | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Ranger | L |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1046 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 74 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 825 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 38 L |