2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1978 Triumph TR7
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Triumph TR7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Triumph TR7 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Triumph TR7 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Triumph TR7 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 278 kg more than 1978 Triumph TR7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Triumph TR7. (162 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Triumph TR7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1978 Triumph TR7 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | TR7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |