2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1979 Mazda 616
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 392 kg more than 1979 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1979 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 616 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 910 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2480 mm |