2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 480 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Ranger | 66 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 822 kg |