2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 473 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | 323 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 850 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2370 mm |
