2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Simca 2 Litres
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 198 kg more than 1982 Simca 2 Litres.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Simca 2 Litres has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Simca 2 Litres will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1982 Simca 2 Litres | |
| Make | Ford | Simca |
| Model | Ranger | 2 Litres |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1125 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2670 mm |
