2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1983 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 461 kg more than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (252 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1983 Skoda Rapid R | |
| Make | Ford | Skoda |
| Model | Ranger | Rapid R |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 252 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1311 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 47 L |
