2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1985 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan Bluebird (105 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 153 kg more than 1985 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Nissan Bluebird. (162 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1985 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1170 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2560 mm |