2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Lada Niva
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada Niva would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1986 Lada Niva. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 58 kg more than 1986 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Lada Niva. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1986 Lada Niva | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Ranger | Niva |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1452 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1150 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 43 L |