2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 929 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2720 mm |