2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 136 kg more than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Plymouth Sundance. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Ford | Plymouth |
| Model | Ranger | Sundance |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 2211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1311 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2470 mm |
