2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1988 Holden Camira
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Holden Camira (115 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 225 kg more than 1988 Holden Camira.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Holden Camira (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1988 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger. 1988 Holden Camira has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 Holden Camira will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1988 Holden Camira | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Camira |
Year Released | 2005 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2580 mm |