2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 219 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Ranger | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2184 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1542 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 57 L |
