2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1989 Mazda 929
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda 929 (110 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mazda 929 weights approximately 137 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 929. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1989 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 929 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2720 mm |