2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (299 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Ranger | XJ6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 299 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |