2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1990 Rover 400
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Rover 400 (115 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 133 kg more than 1990 Rover 400.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Rover 400. (144 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1990 Rover 400 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1075 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2560 mm |