2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1991 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Opel Omega would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 110 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Opel Omega weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Opel Omega. (162 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1991 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Ranger | Omega |
Year Released | 2005 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1330 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |