2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Plymouth Voyager

To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Voyager (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Voyager should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 130 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Plymouth Voyager (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Plymouth Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications: