2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 200 (198 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 27 kg more than 1994 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (137 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1994 Rover 200 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ranger | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 1185 kg |