2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Mazda Familia
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 233 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Mazda Familia has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mazda Familia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1996 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | Familia |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1090 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |