2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 605 kg more than 1996 Proton 300.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Ranger | 300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2450 mm |