2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Rover 414i
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 252 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Rover 414i. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (262 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1997 Rover 414i | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Ranger | 414i |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Torque | 262 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1460 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2780 mm |
