2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1997 Suzuki Sidekick
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Suzuki Sidekick would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Suzuki Sidekick, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (135 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick. (133 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Suzuki Sidekick.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1997 Suzuki Sidekick | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Ranger | Sidekick |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 30 L |