2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Jeep Cherokee

To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1998 Jeep Cherokee. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1998 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 119 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (252 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Jeep Cherokee. (194 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Jeep Cherokee.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Ranger 1998 Jeep Cherokee
Make Ford Jeep
Model Ranger Cherokee
Year Released 2005 1998
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2983 cc 2464 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 252 Nm 194 Nm
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 98.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 81 mm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1311 kg 1430 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1640 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2580 mm