2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1998 Mini MK VII
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mini MK VII. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mini MK VII would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mini MK VII (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mini MK VII should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 567 kg more than 1998 Mini MK VII.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mini MK VII, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1998 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Ford | Mini |
| Model | Ranger | MK VII |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 735 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2040 mm |
