2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Ford Telstar
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Telstar would be higher. Both 2005 Ford Ranger and 1999 Ford Telstar are equipped with a 2,497 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Telstar (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford Telstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Telstar (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 1999 Ford Telstar | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | Telstar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1275 kg |
