2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1999 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Meriva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Meriva would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1999 Opel Meriva. (101 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Opel Meriva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Opel Meriva weights approximately 137 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Opel Meriva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Meriva. (240 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1999 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Ranger | Meriva |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1686 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 53 L |