2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Jeep Varsity
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jeep Varsity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jeep Varsity would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Varsity is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Varsity weights approximately 334 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jeep Varsity (346 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (262 Nm). This means 2000 Jeep Varsity will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger. 2000 Jeep Varsity has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jeep Varsity will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 2000 Jeep Varsity | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Ranger | Varsity |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 262 Nm | 346 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4220 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2800 mm |
