2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 533 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus M250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (262 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Ranger | M250 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 262 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |
