2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Peugeot Vroomster
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Peugeot Vroomster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Peugeot Vroomster would be higher. At 1,758 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Peugeot Vroomster (88 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Peugeot Vroomster should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 332 kg more than 2001 Peugeot Vroomster.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Peugeot Vroomster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Peugeot Vroomster (214 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (137 Nm). This means 2001 Peugeot Vroomster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger. 2001 Peugeot Vroomster has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Peugeot Vroomster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2001 Peugeot Vroomster | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | Vroomster |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 214 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1212 kg | 880 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |