2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2001 Spyker C8
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Spyker C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Spyker C8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Spyker C8 (395 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 309 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Spyker C8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 125 kg more than 2001 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Spyker C8 (481 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Spyker C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2001 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Ford | Spyker |
Model | Ranger | C8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 395 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 481 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1150 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 100 L |