2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder (238 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 742 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan Pathfinder (359 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 2002 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ranger | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 359 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
