2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 MG TF

To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG TF (159 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG TF should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 121 kg more than 2006 MG TF.

Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 MG TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (252 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG TF. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG TF.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Ranger 2006 MG TF
Make Ford MG
Model Ranger TF
Year Released 2005 2006
Body Type Pickup Roadster
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 2983 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 159 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6900 RPM
Torque 252 Nm 174 Nm
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80 mm 89.3 mm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 3 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1311 kg 1190 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2380 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 7.5 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 50 L