2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2006 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Bluebird. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Bluebird. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2006 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |