2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2007 Kia K2700
To start off, 2007 Kia K2700 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,665 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2007 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2007 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Kia K2700 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2007 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2007 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Ranger | K2700 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.6:1 | 18.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |