2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2008 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 207 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2008 Peugeot 207. (119 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2008 Peugeot 207. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 48 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 207. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Peugeot 207 (260 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2008 Peugeot 207 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2008 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Ranger | 207 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 85.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 49 L |