2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Colorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Ranger | Colorado |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 257 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |