2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Lada 110
To start off, 2010 Lada 110 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 1,753 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Lada 110. (76 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2010 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 207 kg more than 2010 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lada 110, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lada 110. (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2010 Lada 110 | |
Make | Ford | Lada |
Model | Ranger | 110 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1753 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1095 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 43 L |