2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Mazda 6

To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Ranger 2010 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Ranger 6
Year Released 2005 2010
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2983 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 226 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1298 kg 1478 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4920 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1839 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2789 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.2 L/100km 8.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 70 L