2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2011 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2011 Toyota Tundra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 57 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2011 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger. 2011 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Ranger 2011 Toyota Tundra
Make Ford Toyota
Model Ranger Tundra
Year Released 2005 2011
Body Type Pickup Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 5663 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 86 HP 381 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 544 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 21.6:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1275 kg 1332 kg
Wheelbase Size 2990 mm 3710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 L 100 L