2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Express is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Express (280 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1353 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Express. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Express (400 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (252 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2012 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Ranger | Express |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1311 kg | 2664 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2012 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 117 L |