2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 177 kg more than 2013 Chrysler 200.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chrysler 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Chrysler 200 has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Chrysler 200 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Ranger | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
| Make | Ford | Chrysler |
| Model | Ranger | 200 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1543 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2121 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1482 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2765 mm |
