2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Mini Cooper
To start off, 2013 Mini Cooper is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Ranger would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 10 kg more than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Cooper, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Cooper. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Cooper.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2013 Mini Cooper | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Ranger | Cooper |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1265 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2547 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 50 L |