2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 6,392 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept (605 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 408 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Shelby GR-1 Concept | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6392 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 605 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2510 mm |
