2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 6,392 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept (605 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 415 more horse power than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (190 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 321 kg more than 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept (679 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Rover |
| Model | Shelby GR-1 Concept | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6392 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 605 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 679 Nm | 306 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 93 L |
