2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, both 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept and 2005 Ford Ranger were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 6,392 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept (605 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 457 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept weights approximately 471 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept (679 Nm) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Shelby GR-1 Concept | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Shelby GR-1 Concept | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6392 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 605 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 679 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |